What is the right balance between aesthetics/human comfort/utility? Does it exists separately?


Aesthetics in any good design cannot be a forced inclusion. For a residence particularly, overall aesthetics, is a derivate of a sensitive process. There may be other projects, like pavilions, commercial facades etc, where aesthetics may be more important, but in residences, it cannot be a separate entity.
Its widely mis-understood that aesthetics of a good building is all about its form. What is celebrated is the word “ front elevation”, where what it looks from a 90 degree perpendicular vision angle from its facade, is seen as the only important aesthetical need of a building. This involves more graphics and cosmetics, while true aesthetics are achieved through articulations of spaces and forms. Fundamental aim of any good architecture is to be functional.
Being functional and comfortable also mean to create “positive “ spaces which respond well to the use its meant for. Scale, proportion, spatial volumes, texture, colour, use of light, ventilation, usability, comfortability, utility are all essential elements of making a space positive. Overall aesthetics of a space is appreciated when the effect of all these qualities slowly seeps inside you. The visual quality of a space is just one of these elements. When a space achieve a higher degree of coherence of various elements, it will attain a quality to inspire and elevate the consciousness of the users. Such spaces have much deeper influence in its users rather than the direct utility its meant for. This quality of spatial articulations have been the basis of various religious architecture. When you attempt such spaces within a house, there is an increase opportunity to create a space beyond normal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

De Earth , a philosophy in the making

My journey in architecture ..

How does a house influence its neighborhood?